At UNGA debate, Pakistan warns against adding more members to Security Council, extending veto privileges
Pakistan has voiced concerns at the UN General Assembly debate, warning that expanding the number of permanent members on the UN Security Council and extending veto powers would exacerbate inequalities and increase the likelihood of the council becoming ineffective.
Pakistan has warned that adding more permanent members to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) and extending veto privileges would “deepen existing inequalities, perpetuate historical advantages and increase the risk of Council paralysis”. The counsello…
Background
The United Nations Security Council is a principal organ of the UN, responsible for maintaining international peace and security. Its permanent members, known as the P5 (China, France, Russia, the UK, and the US), hold veto power. Discussions about reforming the UNSC, including its membership and veto powers, have been ongoing for years, with various nations proposing different models.
Why it matters
Pakistan's stance reflects a desire to maintain the current balance of power and prevent the concentration of further influence in the hands of a few nations. The nation argues that such expansion could undermine the council's legitimacy and effectiveness.
Possible impact
This warning could influence ongoing debates about UNSC reform, potentially stalling or complicating proposals that involve significant expansion of permanent membership or veto rights. It highlights the deep divisions among member states regarding the future structure of global governance.